Tribunal rules against China in South China Sea dispute

China has a military presence in the Spratly Islands, the sovereignty over which is claimed also by several countries in the region.

China has a military presence in the Spratly Islands, the sovereignty over which is claimed also by several countries in the region.

Syndicated News
Written by Syndicated News

Hague tribunal finds that China has no historic title; interferes with Philippine fishing rights

AMSTERDAM/BEIJING — July 12, 2016: An arbitration court ruled on Tuesday that China has no historic title over the waters of the South China Sea and that it has breached the sovereign rights of the Philippines with its actions there, a long-awaited ruling sure to infuriate Beijing.

China, which has boycotted the hearings at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, vowed again to ignore the ruling and said its armed forces would defend its sovereignty and maritime interests.

China’s state-run Xinhua news agency said shortly before the ruling was announced that a Chinese civilian aircraft
successfully carried out calibration tests on two new airports in the disputed Spratly Islands.

And China’s Defence Ministry announced that a new guided missile destroyer was formally commissioned at a naval base on the southern island province of Hainan, which has responsibility for the South China Sea.

“This award represents a devastating legal blow to China’s jurisdictional claims in the South China Sea,” Ian Storey, of
Singapore’s ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, told Reuters.

“China will respond with fury, certainly in terms of rhetoric and possibly through more aggressive actions at sea.”

China claims most of the energy-rich waters through which about $5 trillion in ship-borne trade passes every year.
Neighbours Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam also have claims.

Finding for the Philippines on a number of issues, the panel said there was no legal basis for China to claim historic rights to resources within its so-called nine-dash line, which covers much of the South China Sea.

It said China had interfered with traditional Philippine fishing rights at Scarborough Shoal, one of the hundreds of
reefs and shoals dotting the sea, and had breached the Philippines’ sovereign rights by exploring for oil and gas near
the Reed Bank, another feature in the region.

None of China’s reefs and holdings in the Spratly Islands entitled it to a 200-mile exclusive economic zone, it added.

“No matter what kind of ruling is to be made, Chinese armed forces will firmly safeguard national sovereignty, security and maritime interests and rights, firmly uphold regional peace and stability, and deal with all kinds of threats and challenges,” China’s Defence Ministry said earlier in a bilingual Chinese and English statement shortly before the ruling was made public.

The ruling is significant as it is the first time that a legal challenge has been brought in the dispute, which covers
some of the world’s most promising oil and gas fields and vital fishing grounds.

It reflects the shifting balance of power in the 3.5 million sq km sea, where China has been expanding its presence by
building artificial islands and dispatching patrol boats that keep Philippine fishing vessels away.

The United States and China often conduct military exercises in the area and regularly accuse each other of militarising the region.

“Our experts are studying the award with the care and thoroughness that this significant arbitral outcome deserves,”
Philippine Foreign Affairs Secretary Perfecto Yasay told a news conference, reading from a prepared statement.

“We call on all those concerned to exercise restraint and sobriety. The Philippines strongly affirms its respect for this
milestone decision as an important contribution to the ongoing efforts in addressing disputes in the South China Sea.”
Japan said the ruling was legally binding and final.

U.S. diplomatic, military and intelligence officers said China’s reaction to the court’s decision will largely determine
how other claimants, as well as the United States, respond.

If, for example, China accelerates or escalates its military activities in the disputed area, the U.S. and other
nations will have little choice but to respond with new and possibly enlarged and multinational maritime freedom of
navigation and aerial missions, the U.S. officials said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

Contingency planning for such exercises is already completed or is in its final stages, said one of the officials, who
quickly added: “We hope it doesn’t come to that.”

Oil prices jumped following the findings from The Hague, with international Brent crude futures up over a dollar,
or more than 2 percent, to $47.29 per barrel at 0932 GMT.

The deep waters of the South China Basin between the Spratly and also-disputed Paracel Islands are the most direct
shipping lane between northeast Asia’s industrial hubs of China, Japan and South Korea and Europe and the Middle East.

The case, brought by the Philippines in 2013, hinged on the legal status of reefs, rocks and artificial islands in the
Scarborough Shoal and Spratly Island group.

Manila’s 15-point case asked the tribunal to rule on the status of the nine-dash line, a boundary that is the basis for
its 69-year-old claim to roughly 85 per cent of the South China Sea.

The court has no power of enforcement, but a victory for the Philippines could spur Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei to file similar cases.

Ahead of the ruling, around 100 members of a Philippine nationalist group demonstrated outside the Chinese consulate in Manila today, calling on Beijing to accept the decision and leave the Scarborough Shoal, a popular fishing zone off limits to Filipinos since 2012.

Spreading fast on social media in the Philippines was the use of the term “Chexit” – the public’s desire for Chinese
vessels to leave disputed waters.



About the author

Syndicated News

Syndicated News

News sourced from Bernama, Reuters, AFP and other accredited news agencies, including credible blogsites and news portals.